All posts in category Certification

IPPS: Ambiguous Measures Won’t Reduce Burden

By Sasha TerMaat
Co-Chair, EHRA Executive Committee

man holding three white medication pills

The final 2019 IPPS rule included changes to the Promoting Interoperability/ Meaningful Use program beginning January 1, 2019. Disappointingly, with only six weeks between the close of the public comment period for the proposed rule in late June and the publication of the final rule in early August, CMS’ rushed process and failure to fully consider stakeholder comments (including EHRA’s) led to a rule filled with measures that will be unworkable, inefficient, and onerous.

In a previous blog we delved into PDMP query as just one of the measures where EHR developers anticipate challenges. In that case it’s due to differing levels of PDMP integration with CEHRT and inconsistent references within the rule about whether the query needs to be made via CEHRT, along with other areas in which the measure is ambiguous.  

In this blog post, let’s look at the reasons we’re concerned about a different measure, this one related to opioid treatment agreements.

(more…)

Leave a comment
by EHRA on October 16, 2018  •  Permalink
Posted in Certification, Health IT Regulation, Health IT Standards, Public Policy and Health IT, Usability and Clinician Experience

Posted by EHRA on October 16, 2018

https://ehrablog.org/2018/10/16/ipps-ambiguous-measures-wont-reduce-burden/

Don’t Create a Certification Ceiling

By Sasha TerMaat


Certification blog quoteAt the end of November 2017, JAMIA published the article, “Are all certified EHRs created equal? Assessing the relationship between EHR vendor and hospital meaningful use performance.” The authors, A Jay Holmgren, Julia Adler-Milstein, and Jeffrey McCullough, performed a statistical analysis of publicly available data sets on Meaningful Use EHR Incentive Program performance, stratifying based on the developer of the EHR product used by the Meaningful Use participant.

It’s wonderful to see the data sets published by CMS and ONC used for insightful research. I know from personal experience doing data analysis of CMS and ONC published data sets that a lot of effort goes into data normalization, and the authors took a thoughtful and careful approach.

However, I was surprised by the authors’ conclusions and policy recommendations at the close of the article. Having found EHR developer-correlated variability in performance on certain activities measured in the Meaningful Use incentive program, the authors state that is undesirable, and write recommendations to standardize. The authors say, “Our results suggest that policy-makers should pursue modifications to the EHR certification process to decrease such variation across EHR vendors and improve EHR systems.” (more…)

Leave a comment
by EHRA on January 3, 2018  •  Permalink
Posted in Certification, Health IT Regulation, Health IT Standards

Posted by EHRA on January 3, 2018

https://ehrablog.org/2018/01/03/dont-create-a-certification-ceiling/

New Certification Criteria for APMs–Is This the Right Approach?

CMS and ONC are considering tying the new Alternative Payment Models (APM) being designed per the MACRA legislation to prescriptive criteria for “use” of certified EHR technology, and considering development of new certification criteria specifically created for APMs.  In doing so, do they risk going beyond congressional intent for the APM program and stifling innovation by imposing requirements on health IT beyond what is sought in the market, perhaps pursuing a strategy that may not be the best way to accomplish their end-goals – the rapid shift to value-based reimbursement and more integrated care?

Read “Health IT, Value-Based Payment, and Innovation: Let’s Get it Right” by Mark Segal, PhD (EHRA Chair Emeritus and Vice President of Government and Industry Affairs for GE Healthcare IT) on the GE blog page.

Leave a comment
by ewest123 on December 16, 2015  •  Permalink
Posted in Certification, General, Health IT Regulation, Public Policy and Health IT

Posted by ewest123 on December 16, 2015

https://ehrablog.org/2015/12/16/new-certification-criteria-for-apms-is-this-the-right-approach/

Meaningful Use Stage 3 Is Here and We’re Ready to Respond

We recently saw the release of the 732 pages of the CMS Stage 3 Meaningful Use Proposed Rule and ONC’s Proposed Rule on 2015 Edition Certification. The EHRA Meaningful Use and Certification Workgroups have been gearing up to review and comment on these rules for a while so we have already started looking at the eight proposed objectives and 68 proposed certification criteria.

The scope of what is proposed for certification in this NPRM goes beyond what is proposed to be part of the Meaningful Use program, so other EHRA workgroups are also focused on reviewing the material pertinent to their areas of expertise.  We’re committed to detailed review and developing EHRA’s responses for submission by the May 29th deadline.

Our work depends on the deep expertise of EHRA members and their users!  We strongly encourage your involvement. You’ll have the opportunity to learn from the insights of industry experts in our educational calls, discussions, and consensus based positioning. Participating in EHRA’s work will give you an advantage when working on your own company’s feedback.  Also, you’ll be well positioned to engage your users in what the new proposals might mean for their practices and to encourage them to participate in the public comment process.

(more…)

Leave a comment
by ewest123 on March 30, 2015  •  Permalink
Posted in Certification, Health IT Regulation, Meaningful Use, Public Policy and Health IT

Posted by ewest123 on March 30, 2015

https://ehrablog.org/2015/03/30/meaningful-use-stage-3-is-here-and-were-ready/

Is federal regulation of health IT going to ease up to allow for more innovation?

(July 14, 2014) Read EHRA Chair Mark Segal’s blog post on how he sees regulators responding to persistent requests from the private sector and a variety of stakeholder organizations (including EHRA) to design Stage 3 of the meaningful use incentive program to build on lessons learned from Stages 1 and 2, and focus on interoperability and alignment of quality measures and reporting across government programs.

 

Leave a comment
by ewest123 on July 14, 2014  •  Permalink
Posted in Certification, Electronic Clinical Quality Management, Interoperability, Meaningful Use, Public Policy and Health IT

Posted by ewest123 on July 14, 2014

https://ehrablog.org/2014/07/14/is-federal-regulation-of-health-it-going-to-ease-up-to-allow-for-more-innovation/