EHRs are Prioritizing Data Usability with Help from The Sequoia Project and AHIMA

By Didi Davis, Vice President of Informatics, Conformance & Interoperability with the Sequoia Project

When folks talk about interoperability, the conversation is usually focused on the “why” or the “how” for health information exchange. The Sequoia Project, in partnership with AHIMA and health IT organizations participating in the Data Usability Taking Root Movement, is expanding the dialogue to “what” data is exchanged, and how we can ensure it is accurate, complete, usable, and in alignment with current regulations.

(more…)

Looking Back: The 5 Dominant Issues of 2023

By David Bucciferro (Foothold Technology-Radicle Health), Outgoing Chair, EHR Association

Reflecting on 2023, the year was dominated primarily by five issues of importance to the EHR Association and its 29 member companies, all of which aligned with our overarching focus on collaborative efforts to accelerate health information and technology adoption, advance interoperability, and improve the quality and efficiency of care through the use of EHRs.

(more…)

Concerns Grow over Ambiguity of USCDI Data Classes

By Hans Buitendijk (Oracle) Ex Officio Member, EHRA Executive Committee

As USCDI and USCDI+ expand, we see an increase in ambiguities in their data definitions that are creating increased challenges for programs and health IT required to support USCDI as intended. It’s of particular concern for certified health IT developers, as the ambiguity gap raises questions about what support is actually required, as HL7 FHIR US Core and HL7 CDA C-CDA specifications are used to certify to supporting USCDI.

(more…)

ONC Needs to Address HTI-1’s Burdens on Healthcare Providers, Health IT Developers

By David Bucciferro, Chair, EHR Association

While the EHR Association has long supported the goals of ONC’s proposed rule to advance interoperability, improve transparency, and support further access, exchange, and use of EHI, we have several serious concerns about the impact HTI-1 (ONC’s Health Data, Technology, and Interoperability: Certification Program Updates, Algorithm Transparency, and Information Sharing Proposed Rule) will have on the industry if finalized as proposed. 

Among the most significant are the insufficient implementation timeframes associated with various concepts included in HTI-1 and a failure to accurately consider the significant burden compliance would place on both provider organizations and health IT developers. Vendors need more time than proposed in HTI-1 to accommodate the substantial lift required to deliver safe, compliant, and high-quality versions of their certified products – 18-24 months is the commonly accepted necessary timeframe – while providers need sufficient time to implement, test and become proficient on that upgraded software. 

(more…)

Standards will Make or Break Efforts Toward ePA

By Janet Campbell (Epic), EHRA Public Policy Leadership Workgroup Vice Chair

This is part two in a four-part series examining the need for ePA, the barriers presented by the current environment, necessary capabilities, and functionality, and the EHR Association’s policy recommendations. Part one can be read here.

Streamlining the electronic prior authorization (ePA) process will require significant coordination and standardization across multiple domains within individual healthcare organizations, across dozens of health plans covering their patients, and across the health IT tools in use by every participant in the process.

Progress is being made by various stakeholders in terms of standards development. Notably, the Coverage Requirements Determination (CRD), Documentation Templates and Rules (DTR), and the Prior Authorization Support (PAS) implementation guides – all a part of the Da Vinci Project’s efforts to understand functional requirements, build consensus on a technical approach, pilot, and iterate – have resulted in significant progress toward the enablement of highly automated prior authorization workflows.

(more…)

Genomic Data Sharing Policies Must Protect Patient Privacy, Minimize Risk

By Michael Saito (Epic), Chair & Nam Nguyen, (Allscripts) Vice Chair, EHRA Privacy & Security Workgroup

The National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) ongoing objective of sharing research data sets to facilitate additional study is something EHRA member companies wholly support – as long as it protects patient privacy, ensures patients can provide informed and meaningful consent for use of their data, and minimizes the risk that patients’ genomic and other health data can be re-identified or misused. 

To that end, we took advantage of the NIH’s recent Request for Information (RFI) on the proposed updates to and long-term considerations for its Genomic Data Sharing (GDS) Policy to provide feedback in the key areas of de-identification, potentially identifiable information, and data linkages.

(more…)
  • Categories

  • Follow EHRA on Twitter

  • Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 197 other subscribers
  • Contact Us

    Kasey Nicholoff
    staff @ ehra.org

    Amanda Patanow
    Communications and Media
    ehracomms @ npccs.com